Messianic Certitude

Bill Clinton screwed around with Monica Lewinsky, and then misled the electorate. His actions were blamed on his uncontrolled sexual drive. His presidency remained under a cloud because of it. He apologized and he left office with high approval.

George Bush screwed around with Iraq, and then misled the electorate. His actions were blamed on his messianic certainty. His presidency remained under a cloud because of it. He has yet to apologize and his approval ratings are in the thirties.

Not sure I like messianic certitude driving our country’s highest policy decisions. Isn't that what we are fighting against abroad?

What do I want driving our country’s highest policy decisions? I’ll tell you – I want the best available wisdom, scientific facts, expert opinion, outside opinion, and conversation with the electorate – I want that strategic level decision to be based on the criteria of quality of life. Financial - “bottom line” - improvement should be pushed to the tactical level decisions. I want my country, when possible, to reach out for cooperative and shared solutions; and to accept our place in the world community with humility, honesty, and behaviors appropriate to our common and historic principles.

And our principles are bed rocked on the concept that everyone is born with certain inalienable rights. The question is, has homosexuality been clarified in the minds of those who can offer it (whether they be judges, legislators, executives, or the electorate), such that they are willing to allow us the full citizenship, the full equality, that inalienable rights confer to each citizen?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Top 10 Consequences Of Voting Yes On The Virginia Marriage Amendment

The following is offered as there are opposing lists being circulated by the religious right. So, here are my Top 10 Consequences of Voting Yes on the Virginia Marriage Amendment. 1. Voting Yes is unnecessary, as marriage is already defined in Virginia by statute. 2. Voting Yes ignores the facts – ignores the accepted medicine and science on this subject. 3. Voting Yes to constitutionalize such a socially charged issue, in flux, is clearly in opposition to Jeffersonian Democracy. 4. Voting Yes is an unabashed ploy by cynical Republicans to get out their base. 5. Voting Yes is in opposition to the maintaining of a bright line between church and state. 6. Voting Yes could bring about a myriad of unintended consequences to unmarried heterosexual couples. 7. Voting Yes will continue to paint Virginia as a cultural backwater and an unfriendly place for the location of new high tech businesses. 8. Voting Yes will hardly benefit the thousands of children in gay families nor give hope to many
Read more

I Am Ashamed That Eric Cantor Is My Congressman

I understand that most don’t have the leisure I have, as a retiree, to follow issues, to stay tuned to political debates, to spend time and become involved in local politics. However, it is appalling that those fellow citizens of my 7th District in Virginia have such a knee jerk reaction to this current financial crisis such as to swallow the political rhetoric of Congressman Cantor and to not see this partisan politician for who he is. To see Congressman Cantor spotlighted on national news holding up House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s floor remarks and using this as the reason that Republicans failed to pass their administration’s backed financial crisis bill was nauseating. Cantor was playing politics. Cantor was petty. Cantor was being used by his party handlers to try and shift this failure to reach accord onto the Democrats for political gain. Cantor was seen as a safe spokesman who is from the brightest red district of a red state with little formidable opposition to push this mal
Read more

Yes Virginia, There Are Homosexuals – In Spite Of Mean-Spirited Marriage Amendments

You don't need to be a lawyer to write a marriage amendment apparently, but you could use some common sense. A high school student could have written a better amendment than the proposed Virginia marriage amendment. And if it weren't so poorly written, this topic wouldn't be the subject of debate and discussion all across the Commonwealth. Just using words like "approximate" and "qualities . . . of marriage" for example --- these words mean something different to every one who reads them. At least, you will have to admit that for a constitutional amendment to our Bill of Rights, this language is far from ideal. And more importantly is not easily and consistently communicated to the general populace. But why tiptoe around this. Delegate Robert Marshall has admitted in interviews and debates that he seized onto this quest after Lawrence v. Texas and his homophobia and obsession with sodomy (overlooking that oral sex within heterosexual couples is sodom
Read more