You are a Republican if

You are a Republican if you believe that global warming is caused by flag burning.

You are a Republican if you think tax breaks should go to the one half of one percent of the wealthiest while Congress votes itself a pay raise and fails to raise a minimum wage that has been stuck at $5.15 for nine years.

You are a Republican if you believe that stem cell research is murder but don’t adopt any of the 400,000 frozen embryos that will be discarded.

You are a Republican if you believe that withholding basic human rights from homosexuals will save the heterosexual America family.

You are a Republican if you believe that 9/11 was caused by Saddam Hussein and Iraqis.

You are a Republican if you believe that the bright line between church and state is no longer a basic tenant of democracy.

You are a Republican if you believe that the federal executive should trump over the other two branches of government.

You are a Republican if you believe that millions of children and elderly should have no health insurance while universal health insurance is the standard of every other western democracy.

You are a Republican if you believe that building more prisons is the best answer to crime and drug use.

You are a Republican if you believe that cheap Mexican labor justifies not controlling our borders.

You are a Republican if you support rampant spending while Social Security is destined to disappear for our children.

You are a Republican if you believe that America is better off today than it was five years ago.

Comments

eirishis said…
As a conservative who is disgusted with the current GOP's leadership, I would tend to agree with you. On issues such as global warming, stem cell, gay rights, and the economy, I agree that the GOP has become hypocritical and lost focus on its ideals - the protection of constitutional values, a minimum of government intrusion into private matters, and public policy based on solid evidence and practical movement.

HOWEVER - you are off base on a couple of things:
1) The bright line between church and state has never truly existed. True Republicans believe that there should be no established religion in government, but believe also that we should tolerate nonestablished religion in government.
2) Re: the trumping of the executive ... um, and Democrats didn't favor the hegemony of the executive when they held the White House? Or the legislature when they controlled the Congress?
3) The most ardent supporters of controlling illegal immigration via security are Republicans, not Democrats.

Also, be wary of painting with too broad of a brush. There are many Republicans like myself who want to get back to our core ideals, and have far more in common with our Democratic friends than our GOP leaders. Labeling us all as hatemongers only prevents the type of constructive work that might finally bring down the GOP leaders we both disdain.
Saturday, September 09, 2006 12:08:00 PM
Bill Garnett said…
As a sorta Democrat to a Republican -- I generally agree with you.

And I really agree with you that finding a moderate center to which most Americans can subscribe would be positive to our moving on to working on the common issues facing our country.
Tuesday, September 12, 2006 9:00:00 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Top 10 Consequences Of Voting Yes On The Virginia Marriage Amendment

The following is offered as there are opposing lists being circulated by the religious right. So, here are my Top 10 Consequences of Voting Yes on the Virginia Marriage Amendment. 1. Voting Yes is unnecessary, as marriage is already defined in Virginia by statute. 2. Voting Yes ignores the facts – ignores the accepted medicine and science on this subject. 3. Voting Yes to constitutionalize such a socially charged issue, in flux, is clearly in opposition to Jeffersonian Democracy. 4. Voting Yes is an unabashed ploy by cynical Republicans to get out their base. 5. Voting Yes is in opposition to the maintaining of a bright line between church and state. 6. Voting Yes could bring about a myriad of unintended consequences to unmarried heterosexual couples. 7. Voting Yes will continue to paint Virginia as a cultural backwater and an unfriendly place for the location of new high tech businesses. 8. Voting Yes will hardly benefit the thousands of children in gay families nor give hope to many
Read more

I Am Ashamed That Eric Cantor Is My Congressman

I understand that most don’t have the leisure I have, as a retiree, to follow issues, to stay tuned to political debates, to spend time and become involved in local politics. However, it is appalling that those fellow citizens of my 7th District in Virginia have such a knee jerk reaction to this current financial crisis such as to swallow the political rhetoric of Congressman Cantor and to not see this partisan politician for who he is. To see Congressman Cantor spotlighted on national news holding up House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s floor remarks and using this as the reason that Republicans failed to pass their administration’s backed financial crisis bill was nauseating. Cantor was playing politics. Cantor was petty. Cantor was being used by his party handlers to try and shift this failure to reach accord onto the Democrats for political gain. Cantor was seen as a safe spokesman who is from the brightest red district of a red state with little formidable opposition to push this mal
Read more

Yes Virginia, There Are Homosexuals – In Spite Of Mean-Spirited Marriage Amendments

You don't need to be a lawyer to write a marriage amendment apparently, but you could use some common sense. A high school student could have written a better amendment than the proposed Virginia marriage amendment. And if it weren't so poorly written, this topic wouldn't be the subject of debate and discussion all across the Commonwealth. Just using words like "approximate" and "qualities . . . of marriage" for example --- these words mean something different to every one who reads them. At least, you will have to admit that for a constitutional amendment to our Bill of Rights, this language is far from ideal. And more importantly is not easily and consistently communicated to the general populace. But why tiptoe around this. Delegate Robert Marshall has admitted in interviews and debates that he seized onto this quest after Lawrence v. Texas and his homophobia and obsession with sodomy (overlooking that oral sex within heterosexual couples is sodom
Read more